ARGONNE CO., INC.

v.

HITAFFER

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• Gates v. Foley, 247 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1971)
  …judgment. At common law the wife could not maintain such an action. In 1950 the United States District Court of Appeal for the District of Columbia decided Hitaffer v. Argonne Company, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 57, 183 F. 2d 811, 23 A.L.R.2d 1366, cert. den. 340 U.S. 852, 71 S.Ct. 80, 95 L.Ed. 624 in which the Court updated the common law of the District of Columbia by acknowledging [*42] a cause of action in the wife for loss of consortium. This Court, in Ripley v. Ewell, 61 So. 2d 420 (Fla.1952), rejected the rea…
• Smither & Co., Inc. v. Franciska T. Coles, 242 F.2d 220 (D.C. Cir. 1957)
  …FAHY, Circuit Judge (dissenting). Two questions were decided in Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., 87 U.S.App.D.C. 57, 183 F. 2d 811, certiorari denied 340 U.S. 852, 71 S.Ct. 80, 95 L.Ed. 624. One was, “a wife has a cause of action for loss of consortium, due to a negligent injury to her husband.” This reached new ground in this jurisdiction, after a painstaking analysis of the legal principles involved and rel…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• George Kemp Real Est. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 205 F.2d 236 (2d Cir. 1953)
  …eview despite the provisions .of § 732(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 732(c). Compare H. Fendrich, Inc. v. Commissioner, 7 Cir., 192 F. 2d 916 with George Kemp Real Estate Co. v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 182 F. 2d 847, certiorari denied 340 U.S. 852, 71 S.Ct. 80, 95 L.Ed. 624. The decision was not, in the language of the statute, “necessary solely by.reason of section * * * 722.” • The-principles of collateral estoppel were correctly applied and the decision is affirmed on the opinion of the…