COMPAGNA ET AL.
v.
HIATT, WARDEN

U.S. | 1950-11-13
No. 5
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
340 U.S. 880 Supreme Court of the United States (1950) Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 71 S. Ct. 192 · 1950 U.S. LEXIS 1411 · SCDB 1950-152
Cited by 34 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (17 total)

  • Hennard Harris v. Louie L. Wainwright, 376 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 1979)
    …In other words, gain time allowance is an act of grace rather than a vested right and may be withdrawn, modified, or denied. See Gilstrap v. Clemmer, 284 F. 2d 804 (4th Cir. 1960); Hiatt v. Compagna, 178 F. 2d 42 (5th Cir. 1949) aff’d. 340 U.S. 880, 71 S.Ct. 192,95 L.Ed. 639 (1950); Estabrook v. King, 119 F. 2d 607 (8th Cir. 1941); Kastel v. Fish, 36 F.Supp. 700 (D.C.Md.1931); Shattuck v. Grider, 493 P. 2d 829 (Okl.Cr.1972) citing with approval Dear v. Mayo, 153 Fla. 164, 14 So. 2d 267 (1943); People ex rel…
  • Hyser v. Reed, 318 F.2d 225 (D.C. Cir. 1963)
    …); Story v. Rives, 68 App. D.C. 325, 97 F. 2d 182 (1938); Christianson v. Zerbst, 89 F. 2d 40 (10th Cir. 1937). In Hiatt v. Compagna, 82 F.Supp. 295 (N.D.Ga.1948), rev’d, 178 F. 2d 42 (5th Cir. 1949), aff’d by an equally divided court, 340 U.S. 880, 71 S.Ct. 192, 95 L.Ed. 639 (1950), the Fifth Circuit, obiter dictum, said “There is nothing in the present statute, of force since September 1, 1948, requiring that the warrant be based on ‘reliable information’ as stated in former Title 18, Section 717.” . 18…
  • Pickus v. United States Bd. OF Parole, 507 F.2d 1107 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
    …the Act, e. g., Hyser v. Reed, 1963, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 254, 318 F. 2d 225, 237 (en banc), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 957, 84 S.Ct. 446, 11 L.Ed.2d 315, Hiatt v. Compagna, 5th Cir. 1949, 178 F. 2d 42, aff’d by an equally divided court, 1950, 340 U.S. 880, 71 S.Ct. 192, 95 L.Ed. 639, but whether the Board was an agency was not at issue. In Hurley v. Reed, supra, 110 U.S.App.D.C. at 34, 288 F. 2d at 846, this court said that “the Board is clearly an administrative agency . ” although that was not the issue there.…

Previewing 3 of 17 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw