MOLSEN
v.
YOUNG, INSPECTOR IN CHARGE, U. S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE
MOLSEN
YOUNG, INSPECTOR IN CHARGE, U. S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE
340 U.S. 880
Supreme Court of the United States (1950)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 16 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The joint motion of petitioner and the Solicitor General for remand of this case is granted. The judgments of the Court of Appeals and the District Court are vacated and the cause is remanded to the District Court for consideration of the effect of § 25 of the Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950, 64 Stat. 987, 1013, with leave to each party to present further evidence upon the material issues of the case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (16 total)
-
Hennard Harris v. Louie L. Wainwright, 376 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 1979)…ion therefor. In other words, gain time allowance is an act of grace rather than a vested right and may be withdrawn, modified, or denied. See Gilstrap v. Clemmer, 284 F. 2d 804 (4th Cir. 1960); Hiatt v. Compagna, 178 F. 2d 42 (5th Cir. 1949) aff’d. 340 U.S. 880, 71 S.Ct. 192,95 L.Ed. 639 (1950); Estabrook v. King, 119 F. 2d 607 (8th Cir. 1941); Kastel v. Fish, 36 F.Supp. 700 (D.C.Md.1931); Shattuck v. Grider, 493 P. 2d 829 (Okl.Cr.1972) citing with approval Dear v. Mayo, 153 Fla. 164, 14 So. 2d 267 (1943);…
-
Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Comm. v. McGRATH, 341 U.S. 123 (U.S. 1951)…ation is to be had but on an opportunity to be present and to have counsel, to cross-examine, to object to the introduction of evidence, to argue and to have judicial review. Cf. Hiatt v. Compagna, 178 F. 2d 42, affirmed by an equally divided court, 340 U. S. 880. An injunction against listing could have delayed administration until today. The statutory requirement for a hearing explains the statement in Morgan v. United States, 304 U. S. 1, 14, that “in administrative proceedings of a quasi-judicial charac…
-
Hyser v. Reed, 318 F.2d 225 (D.C. Cir. 1963)…(N.D.Ill.1952); Story v. Rives, 68 App. D.C. 325, 97 F. 2d 182 (1938); Christianson v. Zerbst, 89 F. 2d 40 (10th Cir. 1937). In Hiatt v. Compagna, 82 F.Supp. 295 (N.D.Ga.1948), rev’d, 178 F. 2d 42 (5th Cir. 1949), aff’d by an equally divided court, 340 U.S. 880, 71 S.Ct. 192, 95 L.Ed. 639 (1950), the Fifth Circuit, obiter dictum, said “There is nothing in the present statute, of force since September 1, 1948, requiring that the warrant be based on ‘reliable information’ as stated in former Title 18, Sectio…
Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence