TRANSAMERICA CORPORATION ET AL.
v.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM; AND BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST & SAVINGS ASSOCIATION ET AL. V. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
TRANSAMERICA CORPORATION ET AL.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM; AND BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST & SAVINGS ASSOCIATION ET AL. V. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
340 U.S. 883
Supreme Court of the United States (1950)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597 (U.S. 1966)…0 days’ notice. See A. G. Spalding & Bros., Inc. v. F. T. C., 301 F. 2d 585 (C. A. 3d Cir. 1962). The sole instance where injunctive relief was obtained is Board of Governors v. Transamerica Corp., 184 F. 2d 311 (C. A. 9th Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 340 U. S. 883. In Transamerica the threatened action would have defeated the Board’s jurisdiction entirely. The Board (whose role in § 7 enforcement is like the FTC’s) argued both in the Court of Appeals and in opposition to the petition for certiorari, that if T…1 / 3
-
Telecomms. Research & Action Ctr. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States, 750 F.2d 70 (D.C. Cir. 1984)…Ct. at 1742-43; United States District Court, 334 U.S. at 263, 68 S.Ct. at 1037; Potomac Electric Power Co. v. ICC (“PEPCO”), 702 F. 2d 1026, 1032 (D.C.Cir.1983); Board of Governors v. Transamerica Corp., 184 F. 2d 311, 315 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 883, 71 S.Ct. 197, 95 L.Ed. 641 (1950).28 Because the statutory obligation of a Court of Appeals to review on the merits may be defeated by an agency that fails to resolve disputes, a Circuit Court may resolve claims of unreasonable delay in order to pr…
-
Murray v. Kunzig, 462 F.2d 871 (D.C. Cir. 1972)…316 U.S. 4, [62 S.Ct. 875, 86 L. Ed. 1229] (1942); West India Fruit & S.S. Co. v. Seatrain Lines, Inc., 170 F. 2d 775 (2d Cir. 1948) ; and Board of Governors [of Federal Reserve System] v. Transamerica Corp., 184 F. 2d 311 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 883, [71 S.Ct. 197, 95 L.Ed. 641] (1950).” 384 U.S., at 604, 86 S.Ct., at 1742. . 316 U.S., at 10-11, 62 S.Ct., at 880. . Brief for Appellee, at 8-9. The assertion of the dissent that “The majority attempts to justify its decision by finding that unl…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence