KARRELL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• United States v. Harris, 761 F.2d 394 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …this case, or the amount of loss proved at trial, which was $132,914.56. Although several early cases construing Section 3651 provide some support for defendant’s assertion, see Karrell v. United States, 181 F. 2d 981, 987 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891, 71 S.Ct. 206, 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950); United States v. Follette, 32 F.Supp. 953, 955 (E.D. Pa.1940), we do not believe that it comprehensively states the law as it exists today, and we hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion by order…
• United States v. Stoehr, 196 F.2d 276 (3d Cir. 1952)
  …on has been interpreted to mean that the court’s right to order restitution is limited to actual damages or loss caused by the offense of which defendant is convicted. See Karrell v. United States, 9 Cir., 1950, 181 F. 2d 981, 986, certiorari denied 340 U.S. 891, 71 S.Ct. 206, 95 L.Ed. 646; United States v. Follette, D.C.Pa.1940, 32 F.Supp. 953. Since the exact amount due the government is not normally determined in a criminal action such as this, determination of the amount owed must await either defendan…
• United States v. Taylor, 305 F.2d 183 (4th Cir. 1962)
  …ed.) This provision has been interpreted to limit restitution to the amount involved in the particular offense for which defendant was indicted and of which he was convicted. Karrell v. United States, 181 F. 2d 981, 986-987 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891, 71 S. Ct. 206, 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950); United States v. Follette, 32 F.Supp. 953 (E.D.Pa.1940). We are in substantial accord with the reasoning of these cases. In ordering restitution to the Government, the District Judge is limited to the amount of t…

  ← 1 / 2 →