CARROLL ET UX.

v.

KELLY, ADMINISTRATRIX

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• Evans v. State, 163 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
  …efendant should be represented by counsel. See, for example: Nunley v. United States, 10 Cir.1960, 283 F. 2d 651; Panagos v. United States, 10 Cir.1963, 324 F. 2d 764; Martin v. United States, 5 Cir. 1950, 182 F. 2d 225, 20 A.L.R.2d 1236, cert. den. 340 U.S. 892, 71 S.Ct. 200, 95 L.Ed. 647. Each of the cited cases is similar to the case at bar, in that the defendant had been represented by counsel at the time of plea and conviction but not at the time sentence was imposed. In the Martin case, the court said…
• Grandin v. State, 421 So. 2d 803 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …criminal prosecution. Mempa v. Rhay, 389 U.S. 128, 88 S.Ct. 254, 19 L.Ed.2d 336 (1967); Houston v. Ellis, 252 F. 2d 186 (5th Cir.1958); Ellis v. Ellisor, 239 F. 2d 175 (5th Cir.1956); Martin v. United States, 182 F. 2d 225 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 892, 71 S.Ct. 200, 95 L.Ed. 647 (1950); Van Cleaf v. State, 328 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); [*805] Simmons v. State, 298 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); Wingard v. State, 200 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967); Bryant v. State, 194 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 3d DCA 1…
• United States v. Calabro, 467 F.2d 973 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …question could not have prejudiced Calabro.7 It is equally clear that there was no possibility of prejudice to Calabro because of his attorney’s absence when the verdict was returned. Martin v. United States, 182 F. 2d 225 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 892, 71 S.Ct. 200, 95 L.Ed. 647 (1950); see McGill v. United States, supra; cf. Newagon v. Swope, 183 F. 2d 340 (9th Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 921, 71 S.Ct. 352, 95 L.Ed. 665 (1951). The court here polled the jury on its own motion and thus r…