UNITED STATES

v.

PENNER INSTALLATION CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• In re the Grand Jury Subpoena Addressed to First Nat'l City Bank. United States v. First Nat'l City Bank & William T. Loveland, 396 F.2d 897 (2d Cir. 1968)
  …ation of the life of the Grand Jury. See Loubriel v. United States, 9 F. 2d 807 (2d Cir. 1926); United States v. Collins, 146 F. 553 (D.C.D.Or.1906). See also Howard v. United States, 182 F. 2d 908, 914 (8th Cir.1950), vacated as moot, 340 U.S. 898, 71 S.Ct. 278, 95 L.Ed. 651 (1950). . The omission of bankers cannot be considered accidental. Bankers are apparently privileged to refuse testimony in a civil procecding. See Article 383 of tlie German Code of Civil Procedure. . While it may be true that the s…
• Oleta O'Connor Yates v. United States, 227 F.2d 844 (9th Cir. 1955)
  …as been cited to us indicating that the duty of a witness to answer even in a civil case extends beyond the discharge of the jury in the particular case. . Howard v. United States, 8 Cir., 182 F. 2d 908, 914, reversed on other grounds 340 U.S. 898, 71 S.Ct. 278, 95 L.Ed. 651; Loubriel v. United States, 2 Cir., 9 F. 2d 807, 809; United States v. Collins, D. C., 146 F. 553, 554. . Even though the “petitioner * * * carries the key of his prison in his own pocket” and “can come out, when he will”, In re Nevit…
• In re Grand Jury Witness Chanie Weiss, 703 F.2d 653 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …tes v. Appel, 211 F. 495 (S.D.N.Y. 1913); United States v. McGovern, 60 F. 2d 880 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 287 U.S. 650, 53 S.Ct. 96, 77 L.Ed. 561 (1932); Howard v. United States, 182 F. 2d 908 (8th Cir.), vacated and remanded as moot, 340 U.S. 898, 71 S.Ct. 278, 95 L.Ed. 651 (1950), the questioning of Weiss with respect to the operations of and Weiss’s connections with Project Joint did in fact proceed from the “unimpeachable premise” that Weiss knew something about the organization and her own involvement…

  ← 1 / 2 →