UNIVERSAL CARLOADING & DISTRIBUTING CO., INC.

v.

PEDRICK, ADMINISTRATRIX, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Atl. Land & Improvement Co. v. United States, 790 F.2d 853 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …ment Insurance Act (RUIA), 45 U.S.C. § 351(a).4 The three statutes are interrelated parts of an overall plan designed to benefit railroad employees. See Universal Carloading & Distributing Co. v. Pedrick, 184 F. 2d 64, 65-66 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 905, 71 S.Ct. 280, 95 L.Ed. 654 (1950). The caselaw defining and applying each therefore is highly persuasive and furnishes guidance in this case.5 Railroad Retirement Board v. Duquesne Warehouse Co., 326 U.S. 446, 66 S.Ct. 238, 90 L.Ed. 192 (1946) inv…
• Cnty. OF Thurston v. Andrus, 586 F.2d 1212 (8th Cir. 1978)
  …ds as tax exempt property during the period of the trust.” Thus, the district court applied the vesting principle to the present indefinite extension of the trust periods. See Allbaugh v. United States, 184 F. 2d 109, 114-15 (8th Cir.) cert, denied, 340 U.S. 905, 71 S.Ct. 281, 95 L.Ed. 655 (1950); Board of Commissioners of Jackson County v. United States, 100 F. 2d 929, 933 (10th Cir. 1938), modified, 308 U.S. 343, 60 S.Ct. 285, 84 L.Ed. 313 (1939). We believe the district court correctly did so. This Cour…
• N. Pac. Ry. Co. v. The United States, 355 F.2d 601 (Ct. Cl. 1966)
  …al compliance with the commodity tariff rules. Union Pac. R. R. v. United States, 172 F.Supp. 668, 145 Ct.Cl. 619 (1959). Plaintiff relies on Capital Compressed Steel Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & Pac. R. R., 183 F. 2d 691 (10th Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 905, 71 S.Ct. 281, 95 L.Ed. 655 (1950); and Dulien Steel Products, Inc. v. New York, N. H. & H. R. R., 287 I.C.C. 386 (1952) as precedents for holding in this case that there was a failure to comply with the commodity tariff rules. Unlike the circumstan…