GOSSMAN

v.

CALIFORNIA ET AL.; ROSPIGLIOSI V. CLOGHER; SIMMS ET AL. V. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.; SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES V. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.; ADMIRAL CORPORATION V. HAZELTINE RESEARCH, INC.; SPADAFORA V. UNITED STATES; JERONIS V. SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN; TIMMONS V. FAGAN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Spadafora, 200 F.2d 140 (7th Cir. 1952)
  …aim that he was entrapped by government agents, nor his claim that there was an unlawful search and seizure. United States v. Spadafora, 7 Cir., 181 F. 2d 957, certiorari denied 340 U.S. 897, 71 S.Ct. 234, 95 L.Ed. 650, petition for rehearing denied 340 U.S. 916, 71 S.Ct. 283, 95 L.Ed. 662. In our opinion, after detailing evidence showing that appellant had possession of the counterfeit notes, we said, 181 F. 2d at page 958: “Additional evidence linked the defendant with the seized counterfeit currency, but…
• United States v. Spadafora, 207 F.2d 291 (7th Cir. 1953)
  …entrapment and unlawful search and seizure. This court sustained the conviction of possession of the counterfeit notes. United States v. Spadafora, 7 Cir., 181 F. 2d 957, certio-rari denied 340 U.S. 897, 71 S.Ct. 234, 95 L.Ed. 650, rehearing denied 340 U.S. 916, 71 S.Ct. 283, 95 L.Ed. 662. Subsequently appellant filed a motion in the district court, under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, to vacate the sentence and judgment. This motion was denied on May 23, 1951. An appeal was taken and this court affirmed without opini…