GLANTZ
v.
MICHIGAN CORPORATION & SECURITIES COMMISSION ET AL.
GLANTZ
MICHIGAN CORPORATION & SECURITIES COMMISSION ET AL.
340 U.S. 924
Supreme Court of the United States (1951)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bezzi v. Hocker, 370 F.2d 533 (10th Cir. 1966)…le to the reinjected gas was lost because of its fugacious nature and that the gas then became subject to the law of capture, the trial court relied upon West Edmond Salt Water Disposal Ass’n v. Rosecrans, 204 Okl. 9, 226 P. 2d 965, appeal dismissed 340 U.S. 924, 71 S.Ct. 500, 95 L.Ed. 667. That case involved the liability of one who injected into underground strata of land, salt water, which migrated, or percolated, beyond the boundaries of the land where injected. While the Supreme Court of Oklahoma was…