CALIFORNIA STATE AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION INTER-INSURANCE BUREAU
v.
DOWNEY, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER
CALIFORNIA STATE AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION INTER-INSURANCE BUREAU
DOWNEY, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER
340 U.S. 925
Supreme Court of the United States (1951)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Brewer, 528 F.2d 492 (4th Cir. 1975)…rris, 516 F. 2d 959 (4th Cir. 1975); United States v. E. A. Goodyear, Inc., 334 F.Supp. 1096 (S.D.N.Y. 1971). Its constitutional basis is the commerce clause. Consumer Mail Order Association of America v. McGrath, 94 F.Supp. 705 (D.D.C. 1950), aff’d 340 U.S. 925, 71 S.Ct. 500, 95 L.Ed. 668 (1951). Brewer would have violated the Jenkins Act even if she had traded by means other than the mails, but advertising by radio, for example, would have exposed her and been self-defeating. The mails enabled her to tra…
-
Ryder Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States & Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 716 F.2d 1369 (11th Cir. 1983)…shipping their own goods: superficially, this would seem to constitute private carriage. Both the Commission and Congress, however, saw the arrangement quite differently. See Brooks Transp. Co. v. United States, 93 F.Supp. 517 (E.D.Va.1950), aff'd, 340 U.S. 925, 71 S.Ct. 501, 95 L.Ed. 668 (1951) (mem.). Thus, the Senate Report states that the amendment was intended “to correct most of the abuses that have arisen in the name of private carriage and yet would not in any way jeopardize or interfere with the…1 / 2