STANDARD BRANDS, INC.
v.
BATEMAN ET AL.; AND MIDWEST REFRIGERATION, INC. V. BATEMAN ET AL.
STANDARD BRANDS, INC.
BATEMAN ET AL.; AND MIDWEST REFRIGERATION, INC. V. BATEMAN ET AL.
340 U.S. 942
Supreme Court of the United States (1951)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Complaint and Suit of Samuel Cunningham v. Erie R.R. Co. & United R.R. Workers of Am., Inc., 266 F.2d 411 (2d Cir. 1959)…26 U.S. 561, 66 S.Ct. 322, 90 L.Ed. 318; Johns v. Baltimore & O. R. R., N.D.Ill., 1954, 118 F.Supp. 317, affirmed per curiam, 347 U.S. 964, 74 S.Ct. 776, 98 L.Ed. 1107; and Hayes v. Union Pacific R. R., 9 Cir., 1950, 184 F. 2d 337, certiorari denied 340 U.S. 942, 71 S.Ct. 506, 95 L.Ed. 680, which incidentally was stated by the Supreme Court in Conley v. Gibson, 1957, 355 U.S. 41, 44, note 4, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed. 2d 80 to have been “decided incorrectly.” This is a question of statutory interpretation. It ma…