VIRGINIA E. LEPRINCE AND ACHILLE E. LEPRINCE, PETITIONERS,
v.
NORMAN MCLEOD, M.D., RESPONDENT
VIRGINIA E. LEPRINCE AND ACHILLE E. LEPRINCE, PETITIONERS,
NORMAN MCLEOD, M.D., RESPONDENT
179 So. 2d 856
Florida Supreme Court (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon consideration of the petition we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the petition is denied and the writ discharged.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL, ERVIN and HOB-SON (Ret.), JJ., and McCORD, Circuit Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wiggins v. Fla. Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles, 209 So. 3d 1165 (Fla. 2017)…ot sufficient to amount to competent, substantial evidence. Evidence that is confirmed untruthful or nonexistent is not competent, substantial evidence. Competent, substantial evidence must be reasonable and logical. Gonci v. Panelfab Prods., Inc., 179 So. 2d 856, 858 (Fla. 1965). It follows that a competent, substantial evidence analysis demands an honest look at the evidence available. Otherwise, we are asking judges to simply parrot the findings of the hearing officer, thus reducing the task of a constitu…
-
Joyce v. Federated Nat'l Ins. Co., 228 So. 3d 1122 (Fla. 2017)…n by the trial court in awarding the multiplier. See State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Palma, 555 So. 2d 836, 838 (Fla. 1990). In order to be competent and substantial, the evidence must “comport[ ] with logic and reason.” Gonci v. Panelfab Prod., Inc., 179 So. 2d 856, 858 (Fla. 1965). Because the testimony of petitioners’ attorney and petitioners’ fee expert does not form a logical and reasonable foundation upon which to conclude— as the trial court did—that a multiplier was required, the Fifth District properly…
-
Atkins N. Am., Inc. v. Tallahassee MH Parks, LLC, 277 So. 3d 1156 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence