GLORIA JEAN AMORELLI, A MINOR, BY HER NEXT FRIEND AND FATHER, JAMES AMORELLI, AND JAMES AMORELLI, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLANTS,

v.

ALBERT CAZIN, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM DELOACH, DECEASED, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Outlaw v. Lawrn F. McMICHAEL, 397 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
  …ges was not ascertainable without pleading how long the landlord had assurance of having the tenants stay. This point also is not grounds for dismissal. The [*1011] issue as to certainty of damages is an evi-dentiary matter. See Butler v. Mirabelli, 179 So. 2d 868 (Fla.2d DCA 1965). Points VI through IX basically involve the issue whether the alleged oral misrepresentations would have been inadmissible under the parol evidence rule because of the following language in the contract: NO REPRESENTATIONS, guara…
• Foresight Enters., Inc. v. Leisure Time Props., Inc., 466 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)
  …to support such a damage award. Evans v. Kloeppel, 72 Fla. 267, 73 So. 180 (1916); Wolf v. Buchman, 425 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1983); Hart Land & Cattle Company, Inc. v. Reeves Steel, Inc., 309 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Butler v. Mirabelli, 179 So. 2d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965); Harwell v. Wilder, 247 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1971). One major item of damages sought to be proven in this case was loss of use value. We do not think the record in this case establishes a proper basis for such an award. An awa…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Harwell v. Wilder, 247 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971)
  …la.App.1959), 114 So. 2d 638. . Section 78.01 et seq., F.S.A. . See, e. g., Florida Trust & Banking Co. v. Consolidated Title Co. (1923), 86 Fla. 317, 98 So. 915; Bryant v. Godfrey (Fla.1949), 40 So. 2d 833; and Butler v. Mirabelli (Fla.App.1965), 179 So. 2d 868. Cf., Ocala Foundry & Machine Works v. Lester (1905), 49 Fla. 199, 38 So. 51.…

Authorities Cited

• Gulle v. Purley L. Boggs, 174 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 1965)