PRYOR

v.

CALIFORNIA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• McGOWAN v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420 (U.S. 1961)
  …the Court at least by obiter dictum approved State Sunday laws on three occasions: Soon Hing v. Crowley, 113 U. S. 703, in 1885; Hennington v. Georgia, 163 U. S. 299, in 1896; Petit v. Minnesota, 177 U. S. 164, in 1900. And in Friedman v. New York, 341 U. S. 907, the Court, by a divided vote, dismissed3 “for want of a substantial federal question” an appeal from a New York decision upholding the validity of a Sunday law against an attack based on the First Amendment. The Soon Hing, Hennington, and Petit ca…

  ← 1 / 5 →
• United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc., 344 U.S. 33 (U.S. 1952)
  …ought forward at the last possible moment to undo the administrative proceedings without consideration of the merits and can prevail only from technical compulsion irrespective of considerations of practical justice. In Riss & Co. v. United States, 341 U. S. 907, this Court held that officers hearing applications for certificates of convenience and necessity under § 207 (a) of the Interstate Commerce Act are subject to the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act.4 But timeliness of the objection was…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Fed. Power Comm'n v. Colo. Interstate Gas Co., 348 U.S. 492 (U.S. 1955)
  …tions to the proceedings of an administrative agency be made while it has opportunity for correction in order to raise issues reviewable by the courts.” United States v. Tucker Truck Lines, 344 U. S. 33, 36-37. See also, Riss & Co. v. United States, 341 U. S. 907; Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath, 339 U. S. 33; United States v. Capital Transit Co., 338 U. S. 286, 291; Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Aragon, 329 U. S. 143, 155. [*501] The necessity for prior administrative consideration of an issue is appare…