ADAMS
v.
ALVIS, WARDEN; SCOTT V. MARTIN, WARDEN; HART V. HUNTER, WARDEN; BRADSHAW V. RAYMOND, SUPERINTENDENT; AND CAVE V. RAYMOND, SUPERINTENDENT

U.S. | 1951-04-16
Nos. 425; No. 430; No. 433; No. 435; No. 436
341 U.S. 908 Supreme Court of the United States (1951) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Brannan v. Stark, 342 U.S. 451 (U.S. 1952)
    …Upon remand the provisions were held invalid by the District Court, 82 F. Supp. 614, and that decision, was affirmed in the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. 87 U. S. App. [*453] D. C. 388, 185 F. 2d 871. We granted certiorari. 341 U. S. 908. The question now presented is whether those amendments to the Order which provide for certain payments to cooperative associations are within the authority granted the Secretary by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937.1 The respondents…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw