BAILEY

v.

RICHARDSON ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (57 total)

• Bd. of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (U.S. 1972)
  …Circuit held that public employment in general was a “privilege,” not a “right,” and that procedural due process guarantees therefore were inapplicable. Bailey v. Richardson, 86 U. S. App. D. C. 248,182 F. 2d 46, aff’d by an equally divided Court, 341 U. S. 918. The basis of this holding has been thoroughly undermined in the ensuing years. For, as MR. Justice BlackmuN wrote for the Court only last year, “this Court now has rejected the concept that constitutional rights turn upon whether a governmental ben…
• Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347 (U.S. 1976)
  …eyishian and Perry, however, not only serve to establish a presumptive prohibition on infringement, but also serve to dispose of one suggested by petitioners’ reference to this Court’s af-firmance by an equally divided court in Bailey v. Richardson, 341 U. S. 918 (1951), aff’g 86 U. S. App. D. C. 248, 182 F. 2d 46 (1950).14 That is the notion that because there is no right to a government benefit, such as public employment, the benefit may be denied for any reason. Perry, however, emphasized that “[f]or at…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134 (U.S. 1974)
  …erty interests are at stake does not deal with the entirely separate matter and requirements of due process when a person is deprived of liberty. Bailey v. Richardson, 86 U. S. App. D. C. 248, 182 F. 2d 46 (1950), aff’d by an equally divided court, 341 U. S. 918 (1951), is not controlling. “The basis of this holding has been thoroughly undermined in the ensuing years” with the rejection of the “right-privilege” distinction. Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U. S. 564, 571 n. 9 (1972). Wisconsin v. Constantinea…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Standard Oil Co. of N.J. v. United States, 339 U.S. 977 (U.S. 1950)
• Bailey v. Richardson, 339 U.S. 977 (U.S. 1950)