CHESSMAN
v.
CALIFORNIA ET AL.
CHESSMAN
CALIFORNIA ET AL.
341 U.S. 929
Supreme Court of the United States (1951)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chessman v. Teets, 354 U.S. 156 (U.S. 1957)…w that those facts, and others that might be disclosed upon an adversary hearing focused squarely on the adequacy of the transcript, would not lead it to a different conclusion. Certainly this Court’s previous denials of certiorari, 340 U. S. 840 ; 341 U. S. 929; 343 U. S. 915; 346 U. S. 916; 348 U. S. 864, do not foreclose us from now granting appropriate relief. Brown v. Allen, 344 U. S. 443. And it may be noted that it was not until the present proceedings in the District Court that the facts surrounding…1 / 2
-
Caryl Chessman v. Harley O. Teets, 239 F.2d 205 (9th Cir. 1956)…Ed. 616, decided May 19, .1950. Writ of habeas corpus denied by district court-on December 4, 3950, and application for certificate of probable cause denied by a judge of this court on March 30, 1951. Chessman v. Duffy, Misc. 202, cer-tiorari denied 341 U.S. 929, 71 S.Ct. 800, 95 L.Ed. 1359. Miscellaneous motions denied. Chessman v. California and Duffy, Crim. 5217 (Minute entry, California Supreme Court), decided January 15, 1952. Writ of habeas corpus denied by [*210] district court on November 6, 1951. C…