ANCIL C. ODOM, APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1965-11-18
No. G-229
RAWLS, C. J., and STURGIS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
180 So. 2d 187 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Finkelstein v. Brooks Paving Company, Inc., 107 So.2d 205 (Fla.App.3d, 1958).

RAWLS, C. J., and STURGIS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …ord. So the “PETITION FOR REHEARING” will be stricken ex mero motu. The “PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT OF APPEAL, etc.” will be denied on the merits. In an abundance of caution, however, (Lane v. Most Worshipful Union Grand Lodge, etc., Fla.App. 1965, 180 So. 2d 187) and further because there has heretofore apparently been no specific pronouncement by this Court that a petition for rehearing is not permitted to an order of dismissal, we herewith, in the exercise of our inherent appellate authority, grant ex mer…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw