HENRY E. COLEMAN, APPELLANT,

v.

SYLVIA J. COLEMAN, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1965-11-09

No. 65-768

Before HENDRY, C. J., and TILLMAN PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ.

180 So. 2d 199 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1965) Negative Treatment

Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of Pawley v. Pawley, Fla. 1950, 46 So.2d 464, 28 A.L.R. 2d 1358. See Vanderbilt v. Vanderbilt, 354 U.S. 416, 77 S.Ct. 1360, 1 L.Ed.2d 1456; and Simons v. Miami Beach First National Bank, 381 U.S. 81, 85 S.Ct. 1315, 14 L.Ed.2d 232.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Coleman v. Coleman, 191 So. 2d 84 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)

…PER CURIAM. Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on November 9, 1965 (180 So. 2d 199) affirming the order of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed September 28, 1966 (190 So…
Coleman v. Coleman, 190 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 1966)

…O’CONNELL, Justice. Petitioner seeks review by certiorari of that decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, reported at 180 So. 2d 199. In March 1963 the petitioner husband, as plaintiff, obtained a final decree of divorce from the respondent in the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida. Although the marital domicile of the parties had been in Dade County on their separation the r…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw