KLEIN ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. LEE, 506 F.2d 111 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …to rigorous cross-examination, and the extent and nature of his dealings with federal and state authorities were insistently explored.” 385 U.S. at 311, 87 S.Ct. at 418. . Hallinan v. United States, 182 F. 2d 880, 885 (9th Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 341 U.S. 952, 71 S.Ct. 1010, 95 L.Ed. 1375 (1951). . 53 Am.Jur. Trial § 781 (Interest of Witness); 88 C.J.S. Trial § 340 (Undue prominence to particular matters); § 342 (credibility of particular witnesses); see also §§ 315e, 365. . As noted, and lamented, in…
• Sacher v. Ass'n of the Bar of the City of N.Y., 347 U.S. 388 (U.S. 1954)
  …ing effect on his courtroom behavior that in the future he may be safely expected to exercise without abuse the privileges of membership in this Bar.” The sentence was later affirmed in the Court of Appeals, 182 F. 2d 416, and we denied certiorari, 341 U. S. 952. Later certiorari was granted, 342 U. S. 858. Disbarment followed. Thereafter we affirmed the sentence of contempt, 343 U. S. 1. The disbarment was subsequently affirmed, 206 F. 2d 358. Ex parte Wall, 107 U. S. 265, 273: “ ‘The question is,’ said…
• In re Holloway, 995 F.2d 1080 (D.C. Cir. 1993)
  …d 843 n. 1 (3d Cir.1965) (era banc). If the conviction of contempt is to be sustained, the conduct complained of in the certificate must, in itself, constitute contempt. See Hollinan v. United States, 182 F. 2d 880, 882 (9th Cir.1950), cert. denied, 341 U.S. 952, 71 S.Ct. 1010, 95 L.Ed. 1375 (1951). Where the actions described in the contempt certificate, taken alone, are insufficient to support a conviction for contempt, the contempt conviction may not be saved by pointing to similar incidents of borderlin…