CATES, TRADING AS GLORY BEE PRODUCTS,
v.
HADERLEIN, POSTMASTER OF CHICAGO

U.S. | 1951-10-08
No. 166
342 U.S. 804 Supreme Court of the United States (1951) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. Upon consideration of respondent’s confession of error and the record, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate its order dismissing the complaint.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Gart v. Cole, 263 F.2d 244 (2d Cir. 1959)
    …94 L.Ed. 616, or the denial of a certificate of public convenience to a public carrier in Riss & Co. v. United States, 341 U.S. 907, 71 S.Ct. 620, 95 L.Ed. 1345, or the denial of an individual citizen’s right to use the mails in Cates v. Haderlein, 342 U.S. 804, 72 S.Ct. 47, 96 L.Ed. 609, and Door v. Donaldson, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 188, 195 F. 2d 764 — cases on which appellants rely. Thus this review is not a “case of adjudication” within the quoted words of § 5 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw