WEINMANN

v.

MCGRATH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, SUCCESSOR TO THE ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (U.S. 1957)
  …onditions as it chooses, has long since evaporated. See Brandéis, J., dissenting, in Milwaukee Social Democratic Publishing Co. v. Burleson, 255 U. S. 407, 430-433; Holmes, J., dissenting, in Leach v. Carlile, 258 U. S. 138, 140; Cates v. Haderline, 342 U. S. 804, reversing 189 F. 2d 369; Door v. Donaldson, 90 U. S. App. D. C. 188, 195 F. 2d 764. Hart, The Relations Between State and Federal Law, 54 Col. L. Rev. 489, 493. To give only a few examples: Edmund Wilson’s “Memoirs of Hecate County” was found obs…
• Manual Enters., Inc. v. Day, 370 U.S. 478 (U.S. 1962)
  …he same right of appeal or writ of error.” And see swpra, n. 6; supra, pp. 505-506. These date from 1957. See 39 CFR §§ 14.4, 203 (1962). See Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath, 339 U. S. 33; Riss & Co. v. United States, 341 TJ. S. 907; Cates v. Haderlein, 342 U. S. 804; Walker v. Popenoe, 80 U. S. App. D. C. 129, 149 F. 2d 511; Door v. Donaldson, 90 U. S. App. D. C. 188, 195 F. 2d 764. And see, supra, n. 23. See, e. g., Hearings before House Subcommittee No. 8 of the Committee on the Post Office and Post Roads on…
• Swarb v. Lennox, 405 U.S. 191 (U.S. 1972)
  …practice of this Court to conduct its own examination of the record in all cases where the Federal Government or a State confesses that a conviction has been erroneously obtained.” [*206] That is the practice in civil cases also. Cates v. Haderlein, 342 U. S. 804. Moreover, once a case is properly here, our disposition does not necessarily follow the recommendations or concessions of the parties. Utah Comm’n v. El Paso Gas Co., 395 U. S. 464, 468-469. In that case, the appellant changed its view of the meri…