STROBLE

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• FAR East Conference v. United States, 342 U.S. 570 (U.S. 1952)
  …nied by the District Court, 94 F. Supp. 900, and we brought the case here, under § 262 of the Judicial Code, 28 U. S. C; § 1651 (a), because there are in issue important questions regarding the relation between the Sherman Law and the Shipping Act. 342 U. S. 811. [*573] At the threshold we must decide whether, in a suit brought by the United States to enjoin a dual-rate system enforced in concert by steamship carriers engaged in foreign trade, a District Court can pass on the merits^ of the complaint before…
• Dice v. Akron, 342 U.S. 359 (U.S. 1952)
  …. 155 Ohio St. 185, 98 N. E. 2d 301. We granted certiorari because the decision of the Supreme Court of Ohio appeared to deviate from previous decisions of this Court that federal law governs cases arising under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. 342 U. S. 811. First. We agree with the Court of Appeals of Summit County, Ohio, and the dissenting judge in the Ohio Supreme Court and hold that validity of releases under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act raises a federal question to be determined by federa…
• Stroble v. California, 343 U.S. 181 (U.S. 1952)
  …trial on the issue of insanity. On appeal the Supreme Court of California unanimously affirmed the conviction. 36 Cal. 2d 615, 226 P. 2d 330. We granted certiorari because of the seriousness of petitioner’s allegations under the Due Process Clause. 342 U. S. 811. The facts leading to petitioner’s arrest may be summarized as follows: In the early morning of November 15, 1949, the victim’s body was found behind the incinerator in the back yard of the home of petitioner’s daughter and son-in-law. It was wrap…