GOODLOE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• Lektro-Vend Corp. v. The Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255 (7th Cir. 1981)
  …ing the rule that preliminary injunction determinations do not bind a court in the subsequent trial on the merits. This rule is so well-settled in this circuit, Hunter v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 188 F. 2d 294, 298-99 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 342 U.S. 819, 72 S.Ct. 36, 96 L.Ed. 619 (1951), and in the other circuits as to discourage most modern-day litigation of this issue. See, e. g., Oburn v. Shapp, 521 F. 2d 142,149 n. 18 (3d Cir. 1975); Ross-Whitney Corp. v. Smith Kline & French Laboratories, 207…
• United States v. Ellenbogen, 365 F.2d 982 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …ade the payment by mailing the cheek from New York. Under Title 18 U.S.C. § 3237 5 this furnished sufficient basis for venue in the Southern District of New York. Goodloe v. United States, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 102, 188 F. 2d 621, 622 (1950), cert. denied 342 U.S. 819, 72 S.Ct. 35, 96 L.Ed. 619 (1951). The appellant asserts that at the second trial the Government continued to withhold material which he was entitled to examine under the provisions of the Jencks Act, Title 18 U.S.C. § 3500. We have examined the ma…
• United States v. Porter, 764 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1985)
  …oles v. United States, 308 F. 2d 590 (9th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 836, 84 S.Ct. 79, 11 L.Ed.2d 66 (1963), reh. denied, 375 U.S. 949, 84 S.Ct. 353, 11 L.Ed.2d 280 (1963); Goodloe v. United States, 188 F. 2d 621 (D.C.Cir.1950), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 819, 72 S.Ct. 35, 96 L.Ed. 619 (1951); Chicago & N.W. Ry. v. Kelly, 84 F. 2d 569 (8th Cir.1936). Reservitz has not shown how the trial judge abused his discretion. The record shows the painstaking care the judge displayed when he instructed the jurors…