MARACHOWSKY STORES CO.

v.

O'CONNOR, CUSTODIAN

Citator

Cited By

• Hodgson v. United Mine Workers of Am., 473 F.2d 118 (D.C. Cir. 1972)
  …rits of the judgment from which the relief was sought. See Wagner v. United States, 316 F. 2d 871, 872 (2d Cir. 1963) ; Saenz v. Kenedy, 178 F. 2d 417, 419 (5tli Cir. 1950) ; In re Marachowsky Stores Co., 188 F. 2d 686, 689 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 822, 72 S.Ct. 41, 96 L.Ed. 622 (1951) ; Smith v. Stone, 308 F. 2d 15, 17 (9th Cir. 1962). . Timely filing of a notice of appeal was mandatory and jurisdictional under old Rule 73(a), and it is under new Fed. R.App.P. 4(a). Weedon v. Gaden, 136 U.S.App.…
• Quillie B. Woodham v. The Am. Cystoscope Co. OF Pelham, 335 F.2d 551 (5th Cir. 1964)
  …e, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. * * * ” ; If the plaintiff’s motion is within the ambit of Rule 60(b), the denial of the motion is a final, appealable judgment. In re Marachowsky Stores Co., 7 Cir. 1951, 188 F. 2d 686, cert. den’d, 342 U.S. 822, 72 S.Ct. 41, 96 L.Ed. 622; Greenspahn v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, 2 Cir. 1951, 186 F. 2d 616; and Cromelin v. Markwalter, 5 Cir. 1950, 181 F. 2d 948. Undoubtedly, the plaintiff’s unhappy plight was a product of “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or…
• Weedon v. Gaden, 419 F.2d 303 (D.C. Cir. 1969)
  …79, 208 F. 2d 18, 30 (1953). . Greenspahn v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, 186 F. 2d 616, 618-619 (2d Oir. 1951) ; Cromelin v. Markwalter, 181 F. 2d 948, 949 (5th Cir. 1950); In re Marachowsky Stores Co., 188 F. 2d 686, 689-690 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 342 U.S. 822, 72 S.Ct. 41, 96 L.Ed. 622 (1951). . See, e. g., Muhs v. Acme-Hamilton Mfg. Co., 319 F. 2d 843, 844 (3d Cir. 1963). . This was the specification of Fed.R. Civ.P. 73(a), in effect when the appeal in this case was initiated. Rule 73(a) has since bee…