TATE

v.

CALIFORNIA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Atl. Coast Line R. Co. v. Mack, 64 So. 2d 304 (Fla. 1952)
  …preme Court of the United States decided the case of petitioner in a Per Curiam opinion on the authority of the Alabama case and remanded this case for further proceedings. Florida R. R. and Public Utilities Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 342 U.S. 844, 72 S.Ct. 73. In due course the United States District Court with three Judges sitting dismissed the cause. Petitioner admits that the sixty days provided for by Section 350.641, F.S.A., for a statutory certiorari had long expired and, therefore, s…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Gen. Box Co. v. United States, 351 U.S. 159 (U.S. 1956)
  …. La. Const., 1921, Art. I, § 2. Cf. Eldridge v. Trezevant, 160 U. S. 452; Mayor of Vidalia v. McNeely, 274 U. S. 676; Wolfe v. Hurley, 46 F. 2d 515, aff’d, 283 U. S. 801; Board of Comm’rs v. Franklin, 219 La. 859, 54 So. 2d 125, appeal dismissed, 342 U. S. 844, on authority of Eldridge v. Trezevant, supra, and Wolfe v. Hurley, supra.…
• Atl. Coast Line R.R. Co. v. City OF ST. Petersburg, 242 F.2d 613 (5th Cir. 1957)
  …here is no less an attack upon the Commission’s order where the City is the defendant than would have been the case had the Florida Commission been the defendant. In Florida Railroad & Public Utilities Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co., 342 U.S. 844, 72 S.Ct. 73, 96 L.Ed. 638, reversing 96 F.Supp. 583, the Alabama Public Service Commission case was followed and approved. The district court properly declined jurisdiction. Its judgment is Affirmed.…