PRIDGEN

v.

BUBELLA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United States, 342 U.S. 337 (U.S. 1952)
  …ctural.” 90 F. Supp. 996, 998. The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed, holding that the Regulation, interpreted in conjunction with the statute, establishes a reasonably certain standard of conduct. 188 F. 2d 889. We granted certiorari. 342 U. S. 846. A criminal statute must be sufficiently definite to give notice of the required conduct to one who would avoid its penalties, and to guide the judge in its application and the lawyer in defending one charged with its violation.5 But few words poss…
• Sutton v. Leib, 342 U.S. 402 (U.S. 1952)
  …ce. The court thus gave full faith and credit to the Nevada marriage rather than the New York annulment.2 Because [*405] disposition of this case required treatment of an important question of federal law, review was granted on a writ of certiorari. 342 U. S. 846. Facts. Petitioner, Verna Sutton, divorced respondent, Leib, in Illinois in 1939, and under the terms of the decree of divorce was awarded $125 “on or before the first day of each calendar month . '. . for so long as the plaintiff shall remain unma…
• Gray v. Bd. of Trs. of the Univ. of Tenn., 342 U.S. 517 (U.S. 1952)
  …isdictional questions. In No. 159 Misc., appellants asked, in the alternative, that we issue a writ of mandamus to vacate the order dissolving the three-judge court. We issued a rule to show cause why the petition for mandamus should not be granted, 342 U. S. 846, and, upon the filing of a response to the rule, set the petition down for argument with the appeal. At the argument, counsel for appellees stated that appellants would be admitted to the University of Tennessee as requested. Thereafter, appellants…