G. RICORDI & CO.

v.

PARAMOUNT PICTURES, INC.

Citator

Cited By (37 total)

• Kan. City Power & Light Co. v. McKAY, 225 F.2d 924 (D.C. Cir. 1955)
  …acto negate by implication the right to judicial review under the preclusion clause of Section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act. Airline Dispatchers Ass’n v. National Mediation Board, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 24, 189 F. 2d 685, certiorari denied, 1951, 342 U.S. 849, 72 S.Ct. 77, 96 L.Ed. 641. But preclusion of judicial review might well bo implied here from the statutory scheme involved, at least as we view it, though we do not need to go that far. Cf. Chicago & Southern Air Lines v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 1948…
• Stewart v. Abend, 495 U.S. 207 (U.S. 1990)
  …erm rights to print or copy the underlying work or to create additional derivative works from it. See Gilliam v. American Broadcasting Cos., 538 F. 2d 14, 21 (CA2 1976); G. Ricordi & Co. v. Paramount Pictures Inc., 189 F. 2d 469 (CA2), cert. denied, 342 U. S. 849 (1951).15 Nor may the derivative author dedicate [*252] the underlying art to the public by failing to renew his copyright. See Filmvideo Releasing Corp. v. Hastings, 668 F. 2d 91, 93 (CA2 1981); Russell v. Price, 612 F. 2d 1123, 1128 (CA9 1979).16…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• State of Wash. v. United States, 214 F.2d 33 (9th Cir. 1954)
  …at the state is entitled only to nominal compensation, because the need for the roads has disappeared with the establishment of the government project. City and County of Honolulu v. United States, 9 Cir., 1951, 188 F. 2d 459, 461, certiorari denied 342 U.S. 849, 72 S.Ct. 77, 96 L.Ed. 641; State of California v. United States, supra, 169 F. 2d at page 925; Woodville v. United States, supra, 152 F. 2d at page 737; Mayor and Council of City of Baltimore v. United States, supra. The mere fact that a road, in w…