SADOWY

v.

MORAN, CHAIRMAN OF NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF PAROLE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Rosemound Sand & Gravel Co. v. Lambert Sand & Gravel Co., 469 F.2d 416 (5th Cir. 1972)
  …re considered is that numbered (6), failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Estes v. Shell Oil Co., 5 Cir. 1956, 234 F. 2d 847, 849-850 n. 5. See also Riley v. Titus, D.C.Cir. 1951, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 79, 190 F. 2d 653, cert. denied, 342 U.S. 855, 72 S.Ct. 82, [*418] 96 L.Ed. 644; 2A J. Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 12.09 [3] (1968). The trial judge’s consideration of the motion as a 12(b)(1) motion was proper. Although it was correct to treat the motion as one to dismiss, Rosemound argu…
• Fulwood v. Clemmer, 295 F.2d 171 (D.C. Cir. 1961)
  …devoid of indication of such connection between the treatment and his religious practices or the denial thereof as may predicate relief. White v. Clemmer, supra; cf. Riley v. Titus, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 79, 80, 190 F. 2d 653, 654, certiorari denied 1951, 342 U.S. 855, 72 S.Ct. 82, 96 L.Ed. 644. For all we are shown, appellant’s practices are in contravention both of law and of prison administration regulations. . Contrary to appellee’s argument on brief, we did not in White v. Clemmer, supra, hold that the acti…
• Anand Prakash v. Am. Univ., 727 F.2d 1174 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  …uckleberry Publishing Inc., 486 F.Supp. 414, 433 (S.D.N.Y.1980) (same). . See text supra at notes 27-33. . Prakash v. American Univ., supra note 4, at 2. . Id. . Riley v. Titus, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 79, 81 n. 1, 190 F. 2d 653, 655 n. 1, cert. denied, 342 U.S. 855, 72 S.Ct. 82, 96 L.Ed. 644 (1951); Heyward v. Public Hous. Adm'r, 238 F. 2d 689, 694-695 (5th Cir.1956); Stanley v. CIA, 639 F. 2d 1146, 1157 (5th Cir.1981); Rosemound Sand & Gravel Co. v. Lambert Sand & Gravel Co., supra note 35, 469 F. 2d at 417-4…