JULIUS HYMAN & CO. ET AL.

v.

VELSICOL CORPORATION

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Smith v. Atlas Off-Shore Boat Serv., Inc., 653 F.2d 1057 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …tractual provision specifying a definite term or voyage during which a seaman will be employed, the seaman’s employment is “terminable at will by either party.” Findley v. Red Top Super Markets, Inc., 188 F. 2d 834, 837 n.1 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 870, 72 S.Ct. 112, 96 L.Ed. 654 (1951). Although a seaman who signs on for a voyage or for a specific term of employment is afforded some protection upon discharge,2 no such protection is available to the seaman whose employment is not for a term but…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wallick, 198 F.2d 477 (3d Cir. 1952)
  …refusing reinstatement. We think it is clear that respondents waived their right to discharge the fourteen employees who worked several hours on July 5. See N. L. R. B. v. E. A. Laboratories, 2 Cir., 1951, 188 F. 2d 885, 886-887, certiorari denied 342 U.S. 870, 871, 72 S.Ct. 110. Moreover, the record reveals that respondents continued to look upon all the strikers as employees. The form letters of resignation from the union, prepared by Trosty, respondents’ attorney, were drafted in such a way that each s…
• Hyman v. Joseph Regenstein (Continental Ill. Nat'l Bank & Tr. Co. of Chicago, 258 F.2d 502 (5th Cir. 1958)
  …onduct is abhorrent to our conception of ordinary honesty. * * * Hyman was under a contractual obligation to assign to plaintiff all inventions.” Julius Hy-man & Co. v. Velsicol Corp., 1951, 123 Colo. 563, 233 P. 2d 977, 983, certiorari denied 1951, 342 U.S. 870, 895, 72 S.Ct. 196, 96 L.Ed. 671. In 1949, after Hyman and Julius Hy-man & Company were enjoined from producing and marketing chlordane, the company began marketing “aldrin” and “dieldrin”, other insecticides discovered by Hyman and his associates…