INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION ET AL.
v.
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION ET AL.
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
342 U.S. 890
Supreme Court of the United States (1951)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Reed dissent from the action of the Court in affirming without oral argument.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. United States, 433 F.2d 212 (8th Cir. 1970)…idence to support the proposed rate, the Commission may not hold the rate unlawful upon the mere statement that the carriers have not sustained their burden of persuasion.” New York Cent. R. Co. v. United States, 99 F.Supp. 394, 401 (D.Mass.), aff’d 342 U.S. 890, 72 S.Ct. [*222] 201, 96 L.Ed. 667 (1951) (emphasis added). See also Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States, 263 F.Supp. 552 (D.Colo.1967), app. dis., 389 U.S. 576, 88 S.Ct. 689, 19 L.Ed.2d 775 (1968); Baltimore & O. C. T. R. Co., v. United Sta…