BECKER
v.
NEW YORK

U.S. | 1951-12-03
No. 210
342 U.S. 895 Supreme Court of the United States (1951) Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Festus Moses v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co., 256 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)
    …ppellee is relieved of any possible liability as contended under appellant’s argument on appeal. See Risberg v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Ry. Co., 233 Minn. 396, 47 N.W. 2d 113, cert. den. 342 U.S. 832, 72 S.Ct. 40, 96 L.Ed. 630 (1951), reh. den. 342 U.S. 895, 72 S.Ct. 198, 96 L.Ed. 670 (1951); Paul v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Ry. Co., 96 F.Supp. 578 (D.C.Minn.1950). Affirmed. LILES, Acting C. J., and HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.…
  • …ntirely by a switch crew of the quarry and not by the defendant railroad. It was held that the Act did not apply. In Risberg v. Duluth, M. & I. R. Ry. Co., 233 Minn. 396, 47 N.W. 2d 113, certiorari denied 342 U.S. 832, 72 S.Ct. 40, rehearing denied 342 U.S. 895, 72 S.Ct. 198, the plaintiff, another employee of the quarry in the Paul case, was injured in a collision resulting when he lost control of two cars of the railroad which he had been loading. The brakes were insufficient. The court refused to apply…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw