HENDERSON

v.

OKLAHOMA

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
• United States v. Hutul, 416 F.2d 607 (7th Cir. 1969)
  …sound judicial judgment should lead one to conclude that one defendant cannot have a fair trial, as that term is understood in law, that a severance should be granted.’ ” [*621] Dauer v. United States, 189 F. 2d 343, 344 (10th Cir. 1951), cert. den. 342 U.S. 898, 72 S.Ct. 232, 96 L.Ed. 672. See also United States v. Echeles, 222 F. 2d 144, 151 (7th Cir. 1955); Baker v. United States, 329 F. 2d 786, 787 (10th Cir. 1964). In addition, as the Government points out in its brief, defendant Hutul’s defense was…
• United States v. Boyd, 610 F.2d 521 (8th Cir. 1979)
  …404 U.S. 846, 92 S.Ct. 148, 30 L.Ed.2d 83 (1971); United States v. Hutul, 416 F. 2d 607, 620-21 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1012, 90 S.Ct. 573, 24 L.Ed.2d 504 (1970); Dauer v. United States, 189 F. 2d 343, 344 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 898, 72 S.Ct. 232, 96 L.Ed. 672 (1951). Thus, neither Artez nor Boyd has demonstrated the “strong showing of prejudice” necessary to support their contention. United States v. Hutul, supra, 416 F. 2d at 621. C. Other Contentions Artez next alleges the…