WOODS

v.

KING ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Hobbs v. United States, 451 F.2d 849 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …unable to claim just compensation under § 11(a) because he had and has no patent covering his invention or discovery.” (Emphasis added.) Fletcher v. United States Atomic Energy Com’n, 89 U.S.App. D.C. 218, 221, 192 F. 2d 29, 33 (1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 914, 72 S.Ct. 361, 96 L.Ed. 684 (1952). Obviously, since the inventions claimed here had been the subject of patents, the Commission properly denied petitioners’ claim for an award. 22. H.R.Rep.No.2478, 79th Cong., 2d Sess., p. 17. The quotation in tex…
• Gardner v. The State OF Ala., 385 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1967)
  …orum is exclusive. Whitney Nat’l Bank in Jefferson Parish v. Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co., 379 U.S. 411, 85 S.Ct. 551, 13 L.Ed.2d 386 (1965); Fletcher v. United States Atomic Energy Commission, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 218, 192 F. 2d 29 (1951) cert. den., 342 U.S. 914, 72 S.Ct. 361, 96 L.Ed. 684 (1952). And this result does not depend on Congress using the word “exclusive” in the statute providing for a forum for judicial review. Whitney Nat’l Bank in Jefferson Parish v. New Orleans Bank, supra; Black River Valle…
• N. v. Philips' Gloeilampenfabrieken & Hartford Nat'l Bank & Tr. Co. Under Indenture, 316 F.2d 401 (D.C. Cir. 1963)
  …unable to claim just compensation under § 11(a) because he had and has no patent covering his invention or discovery.” (Emphasis added.) Fletcher v. United States Atomic Energy Com’n, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 218, 221, 192 F. 2d 29, 33 (1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 914, 72 S.Ct. 361, 96 L.Ed. 684 (1952). Obviously, since the inventions claimed here had been the subject of patents, the Commission properly denied petitioners’ claim for an award. In summary, we conclude that the Commission erred in denying all claim…

  ← 1 / 2 →