FOSTER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (43 total)

• Hammond v. Lenfest, 398 F.2d 705 (2d Cir. 1968)
  …In re Phillips’ Petition, 167 F. Supp. 139 (S.D.Cal.1958). See also Crane v. Hedrick, 284 F.Supp. 250 (N.D.Cal.1968). But see Saunders v. Crouchley, 274 F.Supp. 505 (D.Neb.1967). Compare Miley v. Lovett, 193 F. 2d 712 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 919, 72 S.Ct. 366, 96 L.Ed. 687 (1952). The question presented on an application for a writ of habeas corpus is the present legality of the restraint of liberty to which the petitioner is subjected, not whether the restraint was appropriate or justifi…
• In re Multidistrict Vehicle AIR Pollution M.D.L. NO. 31. State of Cal. v. Auto. Mfrs. Ass'n, Inc., 481 F.2d 122 (9th Cir. 1973)
  …by a breakdown of competitive conditions in a particular industry. Otherwise he is not injured ‘by reason’ of anything forbidden in the anti-trust laws.” Conference of Studio Unions v. Loew’s Inc., 193 F. 2d 51, 54-55 (9th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 919, 72 S.Ct. 367, 96 L.Ed. 687 (1952). To attain standing, a plaintiff must thus allege that the antitrust violation injured a commercial enterprise of the plaintiff in the area of the economy in which the elimination of competition occurred. Standing…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Volasco Prods. Co. v. Lloyd A. FRY Roofing Co., 308 F.2d 383 (6th Cir. 1962)
  …355 U.S. 900, 78 S.Ct. 259, 2 L.Ed.2d 198; Productive Inventions v. Trico Products Corp., 224 F. 2d 678, C.A.2, cert. denied, 350 U.S. 936, 76 S.Ct. 301, 100 L.Ed. 818; Conference of Studio Unions v. Loew’s, Inc., 193 F. 2d 51, C.A.9, cert. denied, 342 U.S. 919, 72 S.Ct. 367, 96 L.Ed. 687; Harrison v. Paramount Pictures, 115 F.Supp. 312, 316, D.C.E.D.Pa., affirmed 211 F. 2d 405, C.A.3, cert. denied, 348 U.S. 828, 75 S.Ct. 45, 99 L.Ed. 653; Snow Crest Beverages v. Recipe Foods, cited above. The judgment of…