ZIPKIN

v.

NEW YORK ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Chicago v. Illinois, 355 U.S. 300 (U.S. 1958)
  …resented by the railroad’s petition, whatever may have been the evidence presented before the State Commission. See North Carolina v. United States, 128 F. Supp. 718, affirmed, 350 U. S. 805; Illinois v. United States, 101 F. Supp. 36, 47, affirmed, 342 U. S. 930. Finally, it is argued that the District Court erred in setting aside so much of the ICC order as authorized an increase in the interstate fares to the two Wisconsin points. We believe, however, that these rates are so inter [*312] woven with and s…
• Pub. Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. United States, 356 U.S. 421 (U.S. 1958)
  …58). The legislative proposals of the Subcommittee have been embodied in a bill introduced in the Senate on May 8, 1958. S. 3778, 85th Cong., 2d Sess. Are we to assume that the Milwaukee case has, sub silentio, overruled Illinois v. United States, 342 U. S. 930, affirming 101 F. Supp. 36, where the intrastate suburban service was almost wholly distinct from the carrier’s other operations?…