H. J. HEINZ CO.

v.

OWENS

Citator

Cited By

• Holland v. Allied Structural Steel Co., Inc., 539 F.2d 476 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …tasks aboard the tender, such an isolated period of working as a seaman does not enable him to carry that title into perpetuity. 468 F. 2d at 731. See also Desper v. Starved Rock Ferry Co., 1952, 342 U.S. 187, 72 S.Ct. 216, 96 L.Ed. 205, reh. den., 342 U.S. 934, 72 S.Ct. 374, 96 L.Ed. 695. Without attempting to define what portion of a worker’s duties must be performed aboard a vessel to permit him to claim seaman status, the Court held “that to meet the requirement of Robison that the workman ‘performed a…
• T. Smith & SON, Inc. v. Williams, 275 F.2d 397 (5th Cir. 1960)
  …l courts. * * *" The same argument advanced in the instant ease was advanced in H. J. Heinz v. Owens, 9 Cir., 1951, 189 F. 2d 505, rehearing denied, 9 Cir., 191 F. 2d 257, certiorari denied 342 U.S. 905, 72 S.Ct. 294, 96 L.Ed. 677, rehearing denied 342 U.S. 934, 72 S.Ct. 374, 96 L.Ed. 696. That case involved patent rights. The plaintiffs asked for an injunction restraining state court action, contending that the injunction was necessary “in aid of” the jurisdiction of the federal courts, under Section 2283…