GEACH
v.
ILLINOIS; AND SMITH V. ILLINOIS
GEACH
ILLINOIS; AND SMITH V. ILLINOIS
342 U.S. 939
Supreme Court of the United States (1952)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Illinois Supreme Court for further proceedings. Jennings v. Illinois, 342 U. S. 104..
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39 (U.S. 1968)…0 tax unless it is accompanied by the completed registration form; and it has consistently been upheld in that practice. See United States v. Whiting, 311 F. 2d 191; United States v. Mungiole, 233 F. 2d 204; Combs v. Snyder, 101 F. Supp. 531, aff’d, 342 U. S. 939. The United States has in this case acknowledged that the registration and occupational tax provisions are not realistically severable. Brief on Reargument 37-41. In his trial testimony in Grosso v. United States, decided herewith, post, p. 62, W.…
-
United States v. Kahriger, 345 U.S. 22 (U.S. 1953)…107 F. Supp. 38 (D. C. E. D. Mich.); United States v. Arnold, Jordan, and Wingate, No. 478 (D. C. E. D. Va.), September 18, 1952; United States v. Penn, No. 2021 (D. C. M. D. N. C.), May 1952; Combs v. Snyder, 101 F. Supp. 531 (D. D. C.), affirmed, 342 U. S. 939. There are suggestions in the debates that Congress sought to hinder, if not prevent, the type of gambling taxed. See 97 Cong. Rec. 6892: “Mr. HOFFMAN of Michigan. Then I will renew my observation that it might if properly construed be considered…
Authorities Cited
- Jennings v. Illinois, 342 U.S. 104 (U.S. 1951)