RIVERS

v.

SWYGERT, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Citator

Cited By

• Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Howard, 343 U.S. 768 (U.S. 1952)
  …hood to treat the contract as valid on condition that the Railroad would recognize the colored “train porters”, as members of the craft of “brakemen” and that the Brotherhood would fairly represent them as such. 191 F. 2d 442. We granted certiorari. 342 U. S. 940. While different in some respects, the basic pattern of racial discrimination in this case is much the same as that we had to consider in Steele v. L. & N. R. Co., 323 U. S. 192. In this case, as was charged in the Steele case, a Brotherhood acting…
• Isbrandtsen Co., Inc. v. Johnson, 343 U.S. 779 (U.S. 1952)
  …claim for double wages.3 91 F. Supp. 872. Petitioner appealed but the Court of Appeals affirmed. 190 F. 2d 991. We granted certiorari because the decision below presents an important question of maritime law not heretofore determined by this Court. 342 U. S. 940. Petitioner cites several early lower court decisions which allowed a set-off against a seaman’s suit for wages. These were largely rendered before the Shipping Commissioners Act of 1872 or rendered later without discussion of that or subsequent le…
• Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co., 344 U.S. 206 (U.S. 1952)
  …ember 14, 1951, the Commission filed its petition for certiorari. Obviously, the petition was out of time unless the ninety-day filing period began to run anew from the second judgment entered on September 18, 1951. In our order granting certiorari, 342 U. S. 940, we asked counsel to discuss the “timeliness of the application for the writ.” Petitioner refers us to cases which have held that when a court considers on its merits an untimely petition for. a rehearing, or an untimely motion to amend matters of…