COLEMAN COMPANY, INC.

v.

GRAY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• United States v. Keane, 522 F.2d 534 (7th Cir. 1975)
  …ee generally United States v. Hutul, 416 F. 2d 607, 626 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1007, 1012 and 1024, 90 S.Ct. 562, 573, 599, 24 L.Ed.2d 499, 504, 517 (1970); United States v. Sylvanus, 192 F. 2d 96, 106 (7th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 943, 72 S.Ct. 555, 96 L.Ed. 701 (1952); United States v. Anzelmo, 319 F.Supp. 1106, 1117 (E.D.La.1970). . The defendant argues that the state statutory scheme was so complex that further explanation was required. The difficult question with regard to t…
• United States v. Brien, 617 F.2d 299 (1st Cir. 1980)
  …nconsistent.” Zoila acknowledges that several circuits have adopted the “most gullible” instruction, see, e. g., Lemon v. United States, 278 F. 2d 369, 373 (9th Cir. 1960); United States v. Sylvanus, 192 F. 2d 96, 105 (7th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 943, 72 S.Ct. 555, 96 L.Ed. 701 (1952); Bogy v. United States, 96 F. 2d 734, 741 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 608, 59 S.Ct. 68, 83 L.Ed. 387 (1938), but argues that the more prevalent and correct standard is the “ordinary prudénce and comprehensio…
• United States v. Shavin, 287 F.2d 647 (7th Cir. 1961)
  …he bill of Dr. Arden. While the evidence discloses that the defendant never obtained a settlement of this claim it is not necessary that the defendant obtain money or property. United States v. Sylvanus, 7 Cir., 1951, 192 F. 2d 96, certiorari denied 342 U.S. 943, 72 S.Ct. 555, 96 L.Ed. 701. It is only necessary that the proof disclose that there was the for [*652] mation of a scheme with intent to defraud the insurance carrier, plus the use of the mails in the execution of the scheme. Lemon v. United States…