L'HOMMEDIEU ET AL.
v.
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ET AL.
L'HOMMEDIEU ET AL.
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ET AL.
342 U.S. 951
Supreme Court of the United States (1952)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed. Adler v.' Board of Education, 342 U. S. 485, decided March 3, 1952.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent for the reasons stated in their respective dissenting opinions in Adler v. Board of Education, supra, at pp. 496, 497, 508.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Atchison v. The United States, 549 F.2d 1186 (8th Cir. 1977)…U.S.C. § 2.4 The hearing examiner stated that his decision was compelled by I C C v. Mechling, 330, U.S. 567, 67 S.Ct. 894, 91 L.Ed. 1102 (1947); and James McWilliams Blue Line, Inc. v. United States, 100 F.Supp. 66 (S.D.N.Y.1951), aff’d per curiam, 342 U.S. 951, 72 S.Ct. 626, 96 L.Ed. 707 (1952); cases which he viewed as indistinguishable from the instant controversy. The railroads were directed to remove the unlawful discrimination. The hearing examiner’s decision was affirmed and adopted by Division 2 o…1 / 2
-
United States v. United States Steel Corp., 645 F.2d 1285 (8th Cir. 1981)…h. 3591, § 2, 34 Stat. 588, which amended the Elkins Act, ch. 708, § 1, 32 Stat. 847 (1903), and is now codified at 49 U.S.C. § 11902. . In 1951 in James McWilliams Blue Line, Inc. v. United States, 100 F.Supp. 66 (S.D.N.Y. 1951), aff'd per curiam, 342 U.S. 951, 72 S.Ct. 626, 96 L.Ed. 707 (1952), the court held that, in a proportional rate structure similar to lake cargo coal rates, the availability of a rebate on the first leg of the route could not be based solely upon the mode of transportation used in…1 / 4
Authorities Cited
- Adler v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 342 U.S. 485 (U.S. 1952)