PROPST ET AL.

v.

BOARD OF EDUCATIONAL LANDS AND FUNDS OF NEBRASKA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Ray v. Blair, 343 U.S. 214 (U.S. 1952)
  …edge was held void as unconstitutional under the Twelfth Amendment [*216] of the Constitution of the United States.1 Because the mandamus was based on this federal right specially-claimed by respondent, we granted certiorari. 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (3); 343 U. S. 901. On account of the limited time before the primary election date, this Court ordered prompt argument on March 31, 1952, after granting certiorari and handed down a per curiam decision on April 3, 343 U. S. 154, stating summarily our conclusion on t…
• Frazier v. Lowndes Cnty., 710 F.2d 1097 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …ght based on a new interpretation of preexisting authority— namely the Mississippi Constitution — to terminate the leases. Our case resembles Propst v. Board of Educational Lands and Funds of Nebraska, 103 F.Supp. 457 (D.Neb.1951), appeal dismissed, 343 U.S. 901, 72 S.Ct. 636, 96 L.Ed. 1321 (1952). There the court dismissed a claim brought by lessees against the Nebraska Board of Education Lands and Funds for allegedly treating as void renewal leases it had earlier entered into. The court reasoned: [*1100]…