MAYRATH

v.

HUTCHINSON MANUFACTURING CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Brock v. North Carolina, 344 U.S. 424 (U.S. 1953)
  …282 (1951). The petitioner is here urging that he was placed in jeopardy a second time, and thereby was denied due process of law guaranteed to him by the Fourteenth Amendmerit [*431] to the Constitution of the United States. We granted certiorari. 343 U. S. 914 (1952). For the first time in the history of this Court, it is urged that a state could grant a mistrial in order that it might present a stronger case at some later trial and, in so doing, avoid a plea of former jeopardy in the second trial. The…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Admiral Corp. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 296 F.2d 708 (10th Cir. 1961)
  …truments, Inc., supra, 274 F. 2d p. 816, quoting Oliver United Filters v. Silver, 10 Cir., 206 F. 2d 658, 662, certiorari denied 346 U.S. 923, 74 S.Ct. 308, 98 L.Ed. 416; Hutchinson Mfg. Co. v. Mayrath, 10 Cir., 192 F. 2d 110, 112, certiorari denied 343 U.S. 914, 72 S.Ct. 647, 96 L.Ed. 1329. . Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company v. Supermarket Equipment Corp., 340 U.S. 147, 151, 152, 71 S.Ct. 127, 95 L.Ed. 162. . Consolidated Electrodynamic Corp. v. Midwestern Instruments, Inc., supra, 274 F. 2d p. 817…
• Bewal, Inc. v. Minn. Mining & Mfg. Co., 292 F.2d 159 (10th Cir. 1961)
  …combination and patentable. Consolidated Electrodynamics Corp. v. Midwestern Instruments, Inc., supra, 260 F. 2d at page 816; Oliver United Filters, Inc. v. Silver, supra. Cf. Hutchinson Mfg. Co. v. Mayrath, 10 Cir., 192 F. 2d 110, certiorari denied 343 U.S. 914, 72 S.Ct. 647, 96 L.Ed. 1329. In Oliver United Filters, Inc. v. Silver, supra, a patent was issued on a combination of parts and developments, all well known to the industry, but the result was one which the manufacturers of beet sugar had unsuccess…