FAIRBANKS

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Citator

Cited By

• Chessman v. Teets, 354 U.S. 156 (U.S. 1957)
  …cts, and others that might be disclosed upon an adversary hearing focused squarely on the adequacy of the transcript, would not lead it to a different conclusion. Certainly this Court’s previous denials of certiorari, 340 U. S. 840 ; 341 U. S. 929; 343 U. S. 915; 346 U. S. 916; 348 U. S. 864, do not foreclose us from now granting appropriate relief. Brown v. Allen, 344 U. S. 443. And it may be noted that it was not until the present proceedings in the District Court that the facts surrounding the settlement…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Harris v. Pa. R.R. Co., 361 U.S. 15 (U.S. 1959)
  …se should have gone to the jury: Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Haselden, 338 U. S. 825. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Hill, 340 U. S. 814. New York, New Haven & Hartford R. Co. v. Korte, 342 U. S. 868. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe R. Co. v. White, 343 U. S. 915. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Donnelly, 344 U. S. 855. Denver & Rio Grande Western R. Co. v. McGowan, 344 U.S. 918. Terminal Railroad Assn. of St. Louis v. Barnett, 345 U. S. 956. Southern Pacific Co. v. Miller, 346 U. S. 909. Chicago, Milwaukee, St.…
• United States v. Switzer, 252 F.2d 139 (2d Cir. 1958)
  …d by adopting a literal reading of the statute. United States v. Shapiro, 7 Cir., 101 F. 2d 375, certiorari denied Shapiro v. United States, 306 U.S. 657, 59 S.Ct. 774, 83 L.Ed. 1054; Viles v. United States, 10 Cir., 193 F. 2d 776, certiorari denied 343 U.S. 915, 72 S.Ct. 650, 96 L.Ed. 1330. Although the language of the statute in question has changed, these three cases and the instant case all interpret the language of the statute as it now reads. It is clear that the latter interpretation should be follo…