VON MOLTKE
v.
GILLIES, SUPERINTENDENT
VON MOLTKE
GILLIES, SUPERINTENDENT
343 U.S. 922
Supreme Court of the United States (1952)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 72 S. Ct. 756 · SCDB 1951-114 · 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2186
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
[*922] Per Curiam:
Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Landsman v. United States, 205 F.2d 18 (D.C. Cir. 1953)…he beneficial purposes that Congress had in mind.” 334 U.S. at page 610, 68 S.Ct. at page 1288. See also Thomas v. United States, 6 Cir., 1952, 189 F. 2d 494, cer-tiorari denied 342 U.S. 850, 72 S.Ct. 78, 96 L.Ed. 641, rehearing denied 343 U.S. 932, 72 S.Ct. 756, 96 L.Ed. 1341. . We note that workmen’s compensation, statutes frequently provide that tardy claims may be accepted where “good-cause” is shown or where there was “mistake” or similar excuse. Numerous cases-arising under such legislation hold that…
-
Fultz v. United States, 365 F.2d 404 (6th Cir. 1966)…eptionally difficult legal and factual complexities that carried a possibility of a death sentence, without her ever having known, or having been advised, of such a possible penalty. On the second appeal, Von Moltke v. Gillies, Supt., 343 U.S. 922, 72 S.Ct. 756, 96 L.Ed. 1335, after two of the Justices, who concurred with Mr. Justice Black in his prior opinion, had died, and had been succeeded by new appointees, the judgment of conviction was affirmed, without opinion, by an equally divided Court, Mr. Just…