CHEMICAL BANK & TRUST CO., TRUSTEE,
v.
GROUP OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; ALLEGHANY CORPORATION V. GROUP OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 5¼% SECURED SERIAL BONDHOLDERS COMMITTEE V. GROUP OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; FARWELL ET AL. V. GROUP OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; AND MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. V. GROUP OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS
CHEMICAL BANK & TRUST CO., TRUSTEE,
GROUP OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; ALLEGHANY CORPORATION V. GROUP OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 5¼% SECURED SERIAL BONDHOLDERS COMMITTEE V. GROUP OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; FARWELL ET AL. V. GROUP OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; AND MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. V. GROUP OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS
343 U.S. 929
Supreme Court of the United States (1952)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (18 total)
-
Lindy Bros. Builders v. Am. Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp., 487 F.2d 161 (3d Cir. 1973)…ct, 15 U.S.C. § 15 (1970), does not authorize award of attorneys’ fees to a plaintiff who has settled his antitrust action, rather than pursue it to successful judgment. Cf. Milgram v. Loew’s, Inc., 192 [*165] F. 2d 579 (3d Cir. 1951), cert, denied, 343 U.S. 929, 72 S.Ct. 762, 96 L.Ed. 1339 (1952); Decorative Stone Co. v. Building Trades Council, 23 F. 2d 426 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 277 U.S. 594, 48 S.Ct. 530, 72 L.Ed. 1005 (1928). There is, however, authority for the award of fees under the general equita…
-
Modern Home Inst., Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 513 F.2d 102 (2d Cir. 1975)…hers, may also provide the basis for an inference of illegal conspiracy. E. g., Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United States, 306 U.S. 208, 225, 59 S.Ct. 467, 83 L.Ed. 610 (1939); cf. Milgram v. Loew’s, Inc., 192 F. 2d 579 (3d Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 929, 72 S.Ct. 762, 96 L.Ed. 1339 (1952). Mindful of the foregoing principles and of the requirement that all inferences of fact be drawn in favor of the party opposing summary judgment, see United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 82 S.Ct. 993, 8…
-
Southway Theatres, Inc. v. Ga. Theatre Co., 672 F.2d 485 (5th Cir. 1982)…ed. See, e.g., United States v. Paramount Pictures; Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F. 2d 190 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880, 85 S.Ct. 143, 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964); Milgram v. Loew’s, 192 F. 2d 579 (3rd Cir. 1951) cert. denied, 343 U.S. 929, 72 S.Ct. 762, 96 L.Ed. 1339 (1952). Absent from the record, however, are both the motive and the proof necessary to sustain the charges in this case. It would ordinarily seem that a distributor will prefer the largest possible number of operating…
Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence