BOWEN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Nelson v. State, 208 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968)
  …“In Sunal v. Large, the Supreme Court pointed out that the error did ‘not trench on any constitutional rights of defendants nor involve the jurisdiction of the trial court’. In Bowen v. United States, 5 Cir., 1951, 192 F. 2d 515, certiorari denied 343 U.S. 943, 72 S.Ct. 1036, 96 L.Ed. 1348, however, this Court applied the principle to a collateral attack based on lack of due process: ‘After all, while it is of the essence of the constitutional principles which mark and distinguish our system: that trials…
• Reddick v. State, 190 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)
  …deprived defendant of a fair trial”; Simmons v. United States, C.A.N.J.1962, 302 F. 2d 71, where it was such as to have deprived defendant of a “fair trial”; United States v. Bowen, D.C.Ga.1951, 94 F.Supp. [*353] 1006, aff. 192 F. 2d 515; cert. den. 343 U.S. 943, 72 S.Ct. 1036, 96 L.Ed. 1348, reh. den. 343 U.S. 988, 72 S.Ct. 1079, 96 L.Ed. 1375, where “there has been a deprivation of constitutional rights so fundamental as to amount to a denial of a fair trial”; Dean v. United States, C.A. Mo.1959, 265 F. 2…
• Larson v. United States, 275 F.2d 673 (5th Cir. 1960)
  …” In Sunal v. Large, the Supreme Court pointed out that the error did “not trench on any constitutional rights of defendants nor involve the jurisdiction of the trial court”. In Bowen v. United States, 5 Cir., 1951, 192 F. 2d 515, certiorari denied 343 U.S. 943, 72 S.Ct. 1036, 96 L.Ed. 1348, however, this Court applied the principle to a collateral attack based on lack of due process: “After all, while it is of the essence of the constitutional principles which mark and distinguish our system: that trials…