ROACH

v.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA

Citator

Cited By

• Steele v. Bulova Watch Co., Inc., 344 U.S. 280 (U.S. 1952)
  …ted solely to acts done and trade carried on under full authority of Mexican law, and were confined to and affected only that Nation’s internal commerce, [the District Court] was without jurisdiction to enjoin such conduct.” 5 We granted certiorari, 343 U. S. 962. Petitioner concedes, as he must, that Congress in prescribing standards of conduct for American citizens may project the impact of its laws beyond the territorial boundaries of the United States. Cf. Foley Bros., Inc. v. Filardo, 336 U. S. 281, 28…
• Montgomery Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council v. Ledbetter Erection Co., Inc., 344 U.S. 178 (U.S. 1952)
  …d from this order of the court the petitioners appealed to the Supreme Court of Alabama, which affirmed the order of the trial court. 256 Ala. 678, 57 So. 2d 112, rehearing denied, 256 Ala. 689, 57 So. 2d 121. Certiorari was sought here and granted, 343 U. S. 962. At the very threshold, we are presented with a question of jurisdiction. This Court may grant certiorari from a judgment or decree of the Supreme Court of Alabama, the highest court in the State, only if the judgment or decree is final. 28 U. S. C…
• Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. Wood, 344 U.S. 157 (U.S. 1952)
  …quired a permit. The court then dismissed the bill and denied a rehearing, thereby rejecting the federal questions raised. 219 Ark. 553, 244 S. W. 2d 147. Certiorari was granted because of the Commerce Clause and Federal Motor Carrier Act questions. 343 U. S. 962. We are urged to set aside the findings of the State Supreme Court before passing upon the constitutional questions presented. Petitioner contends that these findings are without evidential support and that the subsidiary findings do not support th…