WELDON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Union Carbide Corp. v. Graver Tank & MFG. Co., Inc., 282 F.2d 653 (7th Cir. 1960)
  …and that defendants were in contempt. This Court, on the basis of the doctrine of “File Wrapper Estoppel,” held that Lincoln’s new fluxes did not infringe and reversed the decision of Judge Dewey. 196 F. 2d 103. The Supreme Court denied certiorari, 343 U.S. 967, 72 S.Ct. 1059, 96 L.Ed. 1363, and petition for rehearing, 344 U.S. 849, 73 S.Ct. 6, 97 L.Ed. 660. We approach the issues argued on these appeals with knowledge of the careful and extensive consideration which has been accorded to the parties and t…
• A. C. Ball Co. v. The United States, 531 F.2d 993 (Ct. Cl. 1976)
  …; the wartime lessening of competition could not have been the sole source of plaintiff’s success. Compare Armstrong v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board, 15 T.C. 625, 637 (1950), aff’d 90 U.S.App.D.C. 152, 194 F. 2d 875 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 967, 72 S.Ct. 1059, 96 L.Ed. 1363 (1952); X-Ray, Inc. v. Renegotiation Board, supra. The refinement, so far as possible, of the effect of the distorted market on the subject part of plaintiff’s profits, in terms of excessiveness of profits, is left for…
• Am. CAN Co. v. Ishwar Mansukhani, 742 F.2d 314 (7th Cir. 1984)
  …rmitted plaintiff to show that its formulas deserved any protection at all. A most instructive analogy is discussed in this court’s decision in Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co., 196 F. 2d 103 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 967, 72 S.Ct. 1059, 96 L.Ed. 1363 (1952). The case arose from the same litigation which produced a leading Supreme Court opinion on patent equivalents, Graver Tank, supra, 339 U.S. at 608-09, 70 S.Ct. at 856-57. The plaintiff in the case brought a conte…